Category Archives: Movies & TV

Oscars Best Picture Roundup

It’s another year and another set of Best Picture nominees to compare and rank accordingly.  This is a rare year in that hadn’t seen ANY of the pictures before the nominations were announced, so I had to do some cram-watching.

There is a popular theory in storytelling that there are only 7 basic plots that all stories fit into.  This became a theme for me as I watched these films and had feelings that many were tweaked  versions of other movies that I had seen before.  The films stacked up oddly for me this year.   About half of this year’s nominees would have trouble being nominated in other years, but still there are no films that I severely dislike as I did in previous years (I’m looking at you Birdman, The Revenant and Mad Max).  Let’s get started.

Lion (4.5 outta 5)

Based on a true story about a 5 year old Indian boy getting lost from his family and his quest to find them two decades later, Lion is clearly the best of this bunch.  The film is split into two parts: the calamitous event that resulted in the boy finding himself 1,500 miles from his home and the grown man trying to trace back what happened in an effort to find home.   Saroo, the main character, is played by child actor Sunny Pawar and later portrayed by Dev Patel.  In filming Sunny Pawar, they could not have made him look any smaller or helpless than they did.  This hooks you in for the rest of the film.  Of course, the first movie this compares to is Slumdog Millionaire, which also starred Patel and dealt with the forgotten children in the streets of Calcutta, but Lion has a much more focused view in portraying Saroo’s journey.  Nicole Kidman does a great job as Saroo’s adoptive Austrialian mother.  I’m pretty bummed at the lack of buzz for this film as a potential winner.  It’s really good.  If you havent yet, GO SEE IT.

Arrival (4 outta 5)

Close Encounters of the Third Kind if M. Night Shyamalan directed it.  Amy Adams portrays linguist tasked with trying to communicate with aliens that have suddenly ported their spacecraft on earth.  The Adams character and her scientist cohort played by Jeremy Renner actually enter the spacecraft hovering over American soil (several ships have arrived all over the world) to learn the basics of each others language in order to converse.  Adams comes to learn the alien’s language is not linear like ours and this factors into their way of thinking and viewing life.  This film introduces some pretty high concepts that provokes a lot of post viewing thought and questions. Recommend.

Fences (3.75 outta 5)

Based on the August Wilson play, Fences is set in 1950’s Pittsburgh and follows 50-something black garbage collector, Troy Maxon and his wife of 18 years, Rose.  Denzel Washington and Viola Davis reprise the roles they both won Tonys for in the 2010 revival of the play.  The film still has the beats of a stage production.

Washington, who also serves as a first time director, plays Maxon like many of his characters: immediately accessible, but as we get to know him, we sense a simmering, acerbic discontent that climaxes to a boiling point.  Maxon feels the world coming down around him as he is  growing older as a black man a decade before the Civil Rights Movement.  The maddening struggle in trying to  reconcile where his own shortcomings end and the limitations enforced by systemic prejudice begin eats at him throughout the film.

Viola Davis’ performance is the highlight of the film.  She’s a lock for the Best Supporting Actress award.  She very well could have been in the Best Actress category.

Hidden Figures (3.5 outta 5)

Based on the true story of three black women who were crucial players in NASA’s efforts in the 1960’s space race settles in like a fine comfort food.  That comfort is also why it isn’t higher on my list.  It often plays like a made for TV movie that you would see perhaps on HBO or Showtime.  There isn’t much character depth here.

I love any story about smart women.  Smart women are hot.  It’s also nice to see Taraji P. Henson in a non-Empire role.  I’m sorry, but I hated that kind of crap TV when it was called Dallas and Dynasty (Get off my lawn!!).  I also must say that  personally I’ve grown mega tired of the white hero trope in these stories of people overcoming prejudice. The Kevin Costner character isn’t a hero for doing the right thing, the problem is there weren’t (and aren’t) enough people doing the right thing until it directly affects them.  Still, the over all feel-good tone of the film is refreshing.

La La Land (3 outta 5)

Ranking this film was hardest for me.  In La La Land, Ryan Gosling’s Sebastion is a struggling musician with aspirations to open his own jazz club that meets Mia, played by the resoundingly mediocre Emma Stone, who is an aspiring young actress.

Neither Gosling or Stone are particularly good singers or dancers, so it is peculiar that they are both cast in this musical in which the two leads are involved in nearly all the music.  In fact, it’s not a stretch to say the two best songs in the movie do not include either lead.  “Another Day of Sun”, the energetic opening ensemble number set in a LA traffic jam (think R.E.M.’s video for “Everybody Hurts”, but really happy) and “Start A Fire” with vocals provided by John Legend both rise above all the Gosling/Stone work.

Somehow, this film lives up to adage “The whole is greater than the sum of it’s parts.” Thanks Aristole! There is enough nostalgia in the depiction of the whimsical old Cinescope musicals that the charm of the movie is hard to deny.  I’m giving it this ranking, but I feel dirty about it because I know I’m being manipulated.

Oh yeah –  hey Hollywood, cut it out with the self-congratulatory Oscar bait movies about your own industry.  They’ve done this twice before in recent history, with Birdman (2015) and The Artist (2012) both winning best picture.

Moonlight (3 outta 5)

Mahershala Ali gives the best performance of all the Best Picture nominated films in his portrayal of Juan, a drug dealer who becomes a male role model for Chiron, a painfully introverted 5 year old boy from a broken home.  Ali is nominated for Best Supporting Actor for the role.  I’ve seen all the other performances except for Michael Shannon’s in Noctural Animals and judging by what I’ve seen Ali deserves to win.  Ali and Janelle Monae, who plays Juan’s girlfriend Teresa, were both also in Hidden Figures.  Actor Stephen Henderson also appeared in two of the nominees, as Denzel Washington’s best friend in Fences and a single scene in Manchester By The Sea.

Ali’s performance is so strong, that you miss him when he is not on-screen.   The film tracks the life of Chiron with time jumps that follow him through pivotal moments during 3 points in his life. Those jumps gave me a Boyhood feel.

Hell Or High Water (2.75 outta 5)

A less interesting No Country For Old Men.  It’s a solid, well shot western/heist film set in the Texas plains. Jeff Bridges does good work in his Best Supporting Actor nominated role of the old Texas Ranger days before his retirement in pursuit of two bank robbing brothers (Chris Pine and Ben Foster).  I’m calling it now: Chris Pine will win an Academy Award in the next 5 years.  I think he’s going to start getting those jobs that Matt Damon is too old for now.

Hacksaw Ridge (2.5 outta 5)

How in the hell is Mel Gibson still able to work on anything?  A film based on a true story, Andrew Garfield plays a conscientious objector on the front lines of the WWII battlefield in Hacksaw Ridge.  As the only soldier to be on the front lines in WWII without a weapon, he was credited on saving 75 lives. Again, this is another film that could be seen as a TV Movie, with the exception of the battle scenes that definitely remind the viewer of Saving Private Ryan.

Manchester By The Sea (2.5 outta 5)

I really don’t get the praise heaped on this film.  Casey Affleck plays a custodian living in a tiny below ground apartment in Boston that returns to his small New England hometown when his brother dies suddenly.  He must then deal with the grief of losing his brother while acting as the guardian to the his 16 year old nephew.  As he stays in Manchester, he must also come to terms with the reasons why he left.  This is the kind of movie you’d find while flipping around cable on lazy weekend and 2 hrs later, you’d be surprised that you watched it until the end.  Fine work, but nothing special.

It appears that the front-runners to win this category are La La Land or Moonlight.  It should be Lion.

BEST PICTURE ROUNDUP

When the Academy Award nominations for Best Picture were announced in late January, I knew that I had my work cut out for me. At that time, I had not seen any of the nominees.   However, there was one movie that I did see in 2015 that I, upon viewing, assumed would be a sure fire nominee. This leads to the elephant in the room.  After now taking in all the participants for Best Picture,  I can safely say that Creed should have been part of this group.
creed-jordan-stallone-xlargeA lot has been made of the overwhelming whiteness of all of the major categories this year and the exclusion of Creed from those categories, with the sole exception of Sylvester Stallone’s Best Supporting Actor nod, seems to be the clearest injustice. At the VERY least, the Ryan Coogler directed film starring Michael B. Jordan should have been a part of the Best Picture pool. I say this while freely admitting that I’m a first class sucker for Rocky movies. I’m such a mark for these films, I’m like this guy:

With all that said, Creed attempts to follow the older film’s formula and still manages to make everything that was old new again without it being an obvious, by the numbers, copy of the original. Anyone who saw Star Wars : The Force Awakens knows how hard that can be.

Now on to the Nominees:

THE-BIG-SHORT-2-1200x849
The Big Short (5 outta 5)

This was one of the two nominated films that competed with Creed when I sized up each film. If Creed were part of this field, I probably would still go with The Big Short as the year’s best. This is a sharply accessible look into the fraudulent mortgage systems and bundled securities that triggered the 2008 financial collapse as well as those in the hedge fund industry that saw it coming. The lighthearted tact that the film took actually lends sanity to the viewer when watching the insane levels of corruption and stupidity that took place. As time passes, I believe The Big Short will be regarded as the go-to movie about the topic and time. Christian Bale earned a Best Supporting Actor nomination and Steve Carell did a fantastic job in his role. As an aside, in a desperate attempt at having a cool nickname, I urge all of you to begin referring to me as “The Big Short”. Use it in conversation when you mention me. “The Big Short is coming over.” “Have you talked to The Big Short?” “The Big Short still owes me $20.” If I’m a contact in your phone, change it so The Big Short comes up when I text or call. Sadly enough, I’m serious about this.

Spotlight-2015-cover-dark
Spotlight (4.5 outta 5)

Based on real life events, this extremely well crafted story of a Boston Globe investigative team uncovering the atrocities of sexual abuse perpetrated by members of the city’s Catholic clergy upon children and the decades long cover-up is all you would want in a journalism procedural. The gravity of the material and the politics of the matter – the true villain being a rotten system with the sweeping power and influence to erase their misdeeds from public knowledge- along with great performances by the whole cast, makes the film gripping and unforgettable. The movie feels like a love letter to the “old” journalism that saw itself as the last protector of the public from large scale bureaucratic corruption. I thought Stallone was a shoe-in for Best Supporting Actor until seeing Mark Ruffalo’s performance. Of the BSA nominees that I saw, his performance was the best. For the record, his major scene near the end of movie definitely got me misty. They really need to do a better job of dusting these theaters. Liev Schrieber has a smaller role, but gives a great turn providing the tone for the movie as the even tempered, out of town new editor.

brooklyn_banner-image1-1243x701

Brooklyn (4 outta 5)

“An Irish immigrant (Saoirse Ronan) in 1950s New York falls for a tough Italian plumber (Emory Cohen), but faces temptation from another man (Domhnall Gleeson) when she returns to her homeland for a visit.”

Be honest. Unless you’re a lady over the age of 58, that summary sounds dreadfully boring, doesn’t it? This movie stays in it’s lane, doesn’t try to be any more than what it is, and still manages to be an engaging and fun experience. With these sort of films, it’s all about exposition and character development. You have to care about the main character for things to work. Saoirse Ronan turns in a very good performance as the main character Eilis Lacey, trying to make her way as an Irish immigrant in early 50’s Brooklyn. The film deals with struggles of the new immigrant life as well as the struggles left behind with the right amount a comic relief tossed in. I’m surprised that there wasn’t a Costume or Production Design nomination for the work done in this film. The look of both 1950’s Ireland and Brooklyn were very believable.

martian-9
The Martian (3.5 outta 5)

A well made, but unspectacular Gravity meets Castaway meets Apollo 13 with an awkward nod to China for foreign box office purposes. The Martian has the feeling of another nominated movie, in that it feels as if it was made in a lab and designed to get the best possible critical and award season acceptance. This kinda proves true as it was awarded the Golden Globe for Best Comedy when it wasn’t a comedy at all. It’s a well made film that you can’t really knock, but will not leave much of a mark beyond the Oscars ceremony on Sunday night.

room_BlogPost_600x300
Room (3.5 outta 5)

This was a very good movie that I never want to see again due to it’s subject matter. This is a story of a mother (Brie Larson) and her 5 yr old son (Jacob Tremblay) escaping after years of captivity in a backyard shed and their subsequent recovery. The story is told from the 5 yr old’s perspective and it is revealed within the story that the mother was abducted 7 years prior, having her son while in captivity. The film goes on to cover the lives destroyed in the wake of the abduction as well as Tremblay’s introduction to the “real world”. Director Lenny Abrahamson does a remarkable job in getting very good work out of a young actor in such a serious role. Honestly, I should rate this as a 4/5, but for me, the bleak content still overshadows the hopeful notes the film intends to leave with you. I always have trouble with stories of captivity and stories of children being victims, so this is a double whammy.

bridge-of-spies-656
Bridge of Spies (2.5 outta 5)

BORING. So, so boring. All of the performances are fine in this historical drama starring Tom Hanks as an American attorney that gets pulled in by the government to negotiate a Cold War prisoner exchange. I just expected more from a film directed by Spielberg and written by the Coen brothers.

Mad_Max_-_Fury_Road
Mad Max: Fury Road (2 outta 5)

Seriously? Creed doesn’t get into the club, but this does? Hey, who doesn’t enjoy a good action movie chase scene? I don’t. More specifically, I don’t enjoy such a scene when it’s the entirety of the 2 hour run time of a movie. There is no character development, pathetic attempts at exposition, but hey there are explosions and guns and crazy costumes in a post apocalyptic desert setting. No thanks. I really don’t get the critical appeal of this movie. It holds a 97% fresh critics rating on Rotten Tomatoes while only getting 86% from the public. That kinda reminds me of last year’s Academy darling, Birdman that had a 91%/78% split. And Birdman reminds me of….

Revenant-banner-02
The Revenant (1 outta 5)

From the director of last year’s Best Picture winner, Birdman comes The Revenant. Apparently, I’m just not a fan of Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu’s work. I HATE HATE HATE HATED this movie. First things first- it’s painfully obvious that from the first phone conversation, to first keystroke on the screenplay adaptation, through the acquisition of financial backing, from pre production to post production and throughout the advertising campaign that the only reason for this movie existing is so Leonardo DiCaprio can get his Oscar. The irony is that DiCaprio turns in one of his more pedestrian efforts. This is NOT an exceptional performance. His work in The Aviator, Catch Me If You Can, The Departed, Gangs of New York and Django Unchained just to name a few films is FAR superior to that of The Revenant. This is a story of a man left for dead in the American frontier by a member of his hunting team that was supposed to tend to him after a savage bear attack. The person that abandons the DiCaprio character and kills his son is played by Tom Hardy who is saddled with portraying a defacto villain character with zero depth. He might as well have had a handlebar mustache to twirl. He might as well have been played by that dude who played the dickhead jock in all those 80’s movies. You know, this guy:

original

Anyways, The Revenant is a miserable watch as it follows the DiCaprio character as he attempts to move his mauled body through the wintery frontier, all in a quest to exact revenge. But, since Mr. Inarritu is an artsy guy and likes for you to know it, there is also a gross attempt to appropriate Native American culture to give the film a BS sense of mysticism. UNCLE!

Will The Revenant repeat Birdman in winning Best Picture while being my least favorite nominee? That’s what the odds makers say! It all goes down Sunday night February 28th.

End of Eras: Come Wallow In My Melancholy…

strip2Last week was certainly a dispiriting time on the TV landscape as two very different eras came to an end:  The 35 year broadcasting career of David Letterman and the 7 season run of AMC’s acclaimed series,  Mad Men.  Watching each of the finales were two completely different experiences for me,  but in the end,  they accomplished the same result:  melancholy.

The success of Mad Men is one of the major highlights of this new “Golden Age” of dramatic television by way of well crafted basic and premium cable shows.  Mad Men was able to last 7 seasons with an ambitious resolve to give so much depth to character, theme and story that it was able to carry the series by giving little moments huge importance.  This was accomplished while never over-stepping the line into eye-rolling pretension.

As this series comes to an end, I’ve wondered if there will be another series that will be able to walk this tightrope, and more selfishly: If it does, will I get it?  That’s part of the deal.  Any work of art, be it music, poetry, photography, film etc, is subject to one’s personal set of discretionary criteria.  “Does the art speak to you?”  I missed out on The Soprano’s for that reason.  While I recognized it as good work,  it just did nothing for me.  Hopefully, when the next show of this caliber comes around, it will speak to me and I won’t go, “huh?”.

Man, I loved David Letterman in my teens and twenties.  I thought he was the coolest person on earth.  A talk show with his irreverence was unlike anything I’d ever seen.  During summer as a teen, I would stay up to watch his show and also tape it, so I could re-watch in the morning when I woke up.  I remember watching him walk out to do his monologue and noticed that he wore wrestling shoes with his suit.  This meant that I started to wear wrestling shoes with whatever I wore.  I watched his show whenever I could during his run on NBC and the first few years on CBS.  I had only seen a handful of shows in the last 15 years or so as the format had grown incredibly stale and being an adult with weird working hours had gotten me out of the habit of watching.   However,  with his final show coming up and the fond memories I had of him, I made a point to watch the three shows of his final week.  These three shows filled me with sadness as the show was so stale and more strikingly, the once brash, fearless comedian that deconstructed the talk show format was now old, slow and tired.   It reminded me of an old man having trouble parking his over-sized Cadillac.  Here was Dave just trying the pull this bloated, out-dated show in, all the while the turn signal has been blinking for the last 10 years or so and he keeps going over the curb.   Of course, adding to my downbeat wistfulness was the retrospective pieces run during the finale that included many moments that I remember watching as they aired, reminding me of the brilliance of the show that I loved.   Alas, Father Time gets the best of everyone.

jon_stewart_foxnews

That now brings me to the pending third member of this depressing triumvirate of departures:  Jon Stewart.   This one will hurt the most, because while Letterman and Mad Men had both run their course and ended accordingly among fanfare,  there is no hint of fuzzy nostalgia with Stewart’s run.   The reason for this is  clear: we still need Stewart politically.  It’s a sad commentary on the state of US news media that the most trusted person in the news is the one doing a fake news show.  That’s just the plain reality.  I fear that without Stewart poking holes in the Fox News talking points,  that the Right Wing will dupe enough of the casual thinking “undecided” voters to swing the 2016 election towards them.   Furthermore, I think that without Stewart engaging the equally casual young, left leaning voters, they will not go to the polls in the necessary numbers to win.  And I haven’t even mentioned how unelectable Hillary Clinton is.

660-Hillary-Clinton-puzzled-AP

This is compounded with the departure of Stephen Colbert’s Colbert Report as he has left the conservative pundit character behind to replace Letterman on CBS.  When Stewart tapes his last Daily Show on August 6th, it will be a sad, sad day.  Here’s hoping that the summer never ends.